On Aug 24, 10:30 am, Bart van Ingen Schenau
<Bart.van.Ingen.Sche...@ict.nl> wrote:
> So, logic dictates that the post-increment must be called before the
> assignment.
> And the sequence point of the assignment operator dictates that the
> pre-increment must be fully complete before the assignment.
> But there is no such relation between the post- and pre-increment
> calls. Therefor, the compiler can order them in any way it likes.

What about the postincrement? Am I wrong to assume that the call
expands to f.operator++(int).operator=(...), or is it simply
absolutely legal to evaluate the parameters of the assignment
operator, prior to eval'ing the expression providing an object on
which to call the op= ?